At first glance, the conversion clause at the end of the document looks like a guarantee of correctness. However, this is where misunderstandings often arise:

Not all signatures are displayed
On one side, the conversion clause mentions numerically which signatures and seals were visualized on the original document. On the other hand, the conversion clause explicitly mentions only those signatures that are recognized by the authorized conversion, including signatures and seals that are not visualized in the document.
Unfortunately, neither way is very intuitive, since in the first case the serial numbers may not correspond to the visuals, not to mention that it may not be clear at first glance that, for example, the signature that was created first is the last visualization in the document. The only thing that can be relied upon is that the list of the mentioned signatures, seals and timestamps is ordered by the time of their creation from oldest to newest.

Some information is lost
Additional information, such as the reason for signing, the location of the signature or contact details, is ignored during conversion, although it may be important information to use when working with the original electronic document. Only the technical details of the certificates and timestamps used remain in the clause.

Not all signatures will be accepted by
Authorized Conversion works only with qualified certificates. If the document has been signed in a "simpler" form, for example using Bank iD Sign or an internal certificate, you will not see these signatures in the clause at all. On the other hand, the conversion will include Bank Identity's qualified seal, but this is not visible on the document.